SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1488

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
Shakila Bano @ Shakila Khatoon Wife Of Majeed Ansari - Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 3869 of 2018
Decided On : 13-02-2019

Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Choudhary, Adv., Gouri S Prasad, Adv.

Proper application of mind by the Magistrate is necessary for the issuance of process under section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C

Headnote:

Quashing - Process under section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C - Improper application of mind by Magistrate

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought quashing of the office-note dated 02.02.2018 for the alleged issuance of process under section 82 Cr.P.C and the order dated 03.07.2018 for the issuance of process under section 83 Cr.P.C against them.

Finding of the Court:

The court found serious infirmity in the approach of the learned Magistrate as there was no formal order passed for the issuance of process under section 82 Cr.P.C, and quashed the office-note and the impugned order.

Issues: Improper application of mind by the Magistrate in issuing process under section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C

Ratio Decidendi: The exercise of powers under section 82 Cr.P.C by the Magistrate must disclose proper application of mind, and without having adopted the procedure under section 82 Cr.P.C, process under section 83 Cr.P.C cannot be issued.

Final Decision: Cr.M.P No. 3869 of 2018 is allowed, and a copy of the proceeding is to be sent to the Director, Judicial Academy, Jharkhand for training of the Judicial Magistrates.

JUDGMENT

Shree Chandrashekhar, J. - The petitioners seek quashing of the office-note dated 02.02.2018 by which process under section 82 Cr.P.C has allegedly been issued and the order dated 03.07.2018 by which process under section 83 Cr.P.C has been issued against them.

2. The petitioners have produced the entire proceeding in P.C. R Case No. 280 of 2016.

3. A perusal of the proceedings in the complaint case would disclose that no formal order for issuance of process under section 82 Cr.P.C has been passed by the Magistrate; there is an office-note dated 02.02.2018 which records, "issue process 82 against accused persons". The exercise of powers under section 82 Cr.P.C by the Magistrate must disclose proper application of mind by him. Without having adopted the procedure under section 82 Cr.P.C, process under section 83 Cr.P.C cannot be issued. As indicated hereinabove there is no formal order passed by the Magistrate for issue of process under section 82 Cr.P.C.

4. In view of the aforesaid facts, finding serious infirmity in the approach of the learned Magistrate the office-note dated 02.02.2018 and the impugned order dated 03.07.2018 by which process under section 83 Cr.P.C has been issued against the petitioners are quashed.

5. In the result, Cr.M.P No. 3869 of 2018 is allowed.

6. Let a copy of the proceeding in P.C.R Case No. 280 of 2016 be sent to the Director, Judicial Academy, Jharkhand for training of the Judicial Magistrates.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top