SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Dipan Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the award passed in Reference Case No.33 of 2012 dated 05.06.2014 has been assailed, whereby and whereunder, the reference has been answered against the petitioner-workman in favour of the respondent-management by denying the reinstatement in service with back wages.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has joined the duty of the Nagar Nigam, Ranchi in the year 1982 and continued in service till 15.06.2011 but all of a sudden he has been removed from service without issuing any notice, therefore, he has come on road, hence a dispute has been raised by making an application before the appropriate authority, the matter has been placed before the Conciliating Officer but when no decision has been taken within the stipulated period as provided under the provision of Section 12 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , an application has been filed under the provision of Section 2(A) of the Act, 1947 for demanding reinstatement in service with back wages.
The Labour Court treating the said demand as reference, registered a case being Reference Case No.33 of 2012 and issued notice to the Mun
Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao Vs. Ashalata S. Guram (1986) 4 SCC 447
Hari Vishnu Kamath Vs. Ahmad Ishaque
Heinz India P Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. (2012) 5 SCC 443
Kaushalya Devi Vs. Bachittar Singh
Nagendra Nath Vs. Commr. Of Hills Division
Pepsico India Holding P Ltd. Vs. Krishna Kant Pandey (2015) 4 SCC 270
Sawarn Singh Vs. State of Punjab (1976) 2 SCC 868
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.