SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1753

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Robert Prabhat Minz – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Khan, Adv., Atanu Banerjee, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. - The instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for restoration of writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 1354 of 2017, which has been dismissed vide order dated 12.02.2019 for non-compliance of order dated 05.02.2019.

2. Mr. A Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for defect pertaining to filing of fresh copy of document, the petitioner due to inadvertence has given typed copy, as such for non-compliance of peremptory order, the writ petition stood dismissed, now since the defects have been removed, therefore, the writ petition may be restored to its original file otherwise the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents, without objecting to such submissions, has submitted that appropriate order may be passed.

4. This Court after hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, deem it fit and proper to allow the prayer made in the instant petition by restoring the writ petition, being W.P.(C) No. 1354 of 2017 to its original file. The Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top