ORDER :

1. With the consent of the parties, hearing of this matter has been done through video conferencing.

I.A. No. 9052 of 2019

2. This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 490 days in preferring this Letters Patent Appeal.

3. Heard.

4. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties and the averments made in the interlocutory application, we are of the view that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in preferring the appeal within the period of limitation.

5. Accordingly, I.A. No. 9052 of 2019 is allowed and delay of 490 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.

L.P.A. No. 616 of 2019

6. This instant intra court appeal is directed against the order/judgment dated 04.04.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (L) No. 4567 of 2015, whereby and whereunder the order dated 30.07.2015 has been refused to be interfered with by dismissing the writ petition, by which the appellant’s claim of registering an industrial dispute under Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act 1947’) has been refused on the ground that the service of the appel