SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Jhk) 469

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Wakil Deo Mahto S/o Sri. Doman Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Atanu Banerjee.
For the Respondent: Ms. Mahua Palit.

JUDGMENT :

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard Mr. Atanu Banerjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard Ms. Mahua Palit, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State of Jharkhand.

3. This Criminal Revision application is directed against the judgment dated 20.05.2014 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 2014 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bermo at Tenughat, whereby the appeal preferred on behalf of the present petitioner against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence including imposition of fine dated 23.09.2004 has been dismissed with a direction upon the petitioner to pay fine amount within ten days, failing which the petitioner was to surrender before the court below within ten days from the date of order to serve out the sentence of one month Simple Imprisonment.

The petitioner was held to be in conflict with law and judgment of conviction was passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat in G.R. No. 911 of 2002 arising out of Mahuwatand P.S. Case No. 40 of 2002, T.R. No. 201 of 2004 holding the petitioner in conflict with law and convicting the petitioner under Section 417 of the Ind

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top