ORDER :

1. With the consent of the parties, hearing of this matter has been done through video conferencing. They have no complaint about any audio and visual connectivity.

2. The instant intra-court appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Patna High Court, directed against the order/judgment dated 27.07.2018 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No.160 of 2017, whereby and whereunder the writ petition has been dismissed, denying the claim of the petitioner for regularization in the service as also, has refused to interfere with the order of disengagement passed vide order dated 04.04.2018 by which the prayer for regularization of the service of the writ petitioner has been refused.

3. At the outset, the learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that due to inadvertence the reference of disengagement from service has been typed in the impugned order by making reference of order dated 04.04.2018 but it would be evident from the order dated 04.04.2018 that the same does not pertain to disengagement of the petitioner from service, rather by virtue of the said decision the claim of regularization from service has been rejected.

This Court considering the