SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1885

S.N.PATHAK
Md. Nasim Ather – Appellant
Versus
Tenughat Vidyut Nigam Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ajit Kumar.
For the Respondent: Rupesh Singh.

ORDER :

1. Heard the parties.

2. Petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the office Order No. 235/17-19 dated 12.9.2017 (Annexure-6), whereby the respondent No. 2, while revoking the order of suspension, has debarred the petitioners from getting salary of the period of suspension.

3. The factual exposition as has been delineated in the writ petition is that petitioner No. 1, whose date of birth is 5.8.1974, has joined the post of Operator under the Tenughat Thermal Power Station, Lalpania and in the year 2001, he successfully completed the AMIE Course. Thereafter, on 29.10.2008, he was promoted to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer (Operation). Similarly, the petitioner No. 2 was initially engaged as Control Penal Engineer on contract basis in the year 2002. Thereafter, on 19.10.2012, he joined the permanent post of Unit Control Engineer (Electrical) and further promoted to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer in Operation Grade-D. On 11.12.2015, the petitioner No. 1 was transferred to the post of Shift Incharge Engineer and Executive Engineer Incharge, Group-A. It is the further case of the petitioners that by Office order dated 16.11.2016, the respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top