SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kario Oraoin – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Alok Lal, Advocate
For the Respondents:Ashutosh Anand and Nehala Sharmin, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.

1. Heard Mr. Alok Lal, counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant in all these cases.

2. Heard Mr. Ashutosh Anand, counsel appearing on behalf of the claimants in all these cases.

3. Heard Ms. Nehala Sharmin, counsel appearing on behalf of owner of the vehicle in all these cases.

4. Counsel for the appellant submits that all these appeals arise out of common accident caused by the truck bearing Registration No. BR-14H-9642 on 18.12.1999 at 7.00 am.

5. Arising out of the same accident, different claimants had instituted different cases under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 which are as follows:-

SI. No.

M.A. Case Number

W. C. Case Number

1.

M.A. 62 of 2005

W.C. Case No. 05 of 2003

2.

M.A. 63 of 2005

W.C. Case No. 04 of 2003

3.

M.A. 64 of 2005

W.C. Case No. 03 of 2003

4.

M.A. 65 of 2005

W.C. Case No. 02 of 2003

6. The counsel submits that so far as all these Workmen Compensation Cases are concerned, they were taken up together by the learned court below and all the evidences in connection wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top