SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Jhk) 605

RAJESH SHANKAR
Pranesh Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Niranjan Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Kumar Asthana.

ORDER :

1. The present case is taken up through video conferencing.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to ascertain appropriate compensation of land as per the market value along with other amount as solatium etc. as the land of the petitioners appertaining to Khata Nos. 55 and 103, plot nos. 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 501/612 and 503 measuring an area of 0.79 acre, Mouza-Nawadih, Thana No. 292, District- Deoghar (hereinafter referred to as “the said land”) has been acquired in L.A. Case No. 54 of 2017-18 for construction of a Road Over Bridge (ROB) over the railway crossing between the Shankarpur-Jasidih Railway Station being level crossing no. 27/C/E.

3. The factual background of the case as stated in the writ petition is that the said land was recorded in the name of one Suwansh Lal. Jamabandi of the said land was also opened in his name and accordingly, he was regularly paying the rent thereof. After his death, the petitioners and other co-sharers came in possession of the said land and started paying rent of the same. Further, a notice was issued by the Assistant Engineer, Department of Road Construction, Deoghar (respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top