SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
United Engineering Works, through its proprietor Mr. Pramod Behl – Appellant
Versus
Basanti Tirkey – Respondent
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has sought for leave of this Court for deletion of Article 226 from the provision of Law under which, this writ petition has been filed.
2. In view of such submission, learned counsel for the petitioner, is directed to make necessary correction in provision of Law, in course of the day.
3. This writ petition is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, whereby and whereunder the order dated 09.04.2019 passed in Motor Accident Claim Case No.100 of 2012, is under challenge, whereby and whereunder, the petition dated 04.04.2012 praying therein to mark exhibit the document filed as per the list dated 04.04.2019 and further to mark exhibit paper cutting of Hindi Daily Newspaper “Prabhat Khabar” dated 09.01.2011 filed on behalf of the applicant, has been rejected.
4. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in this writ petition is that a compensation case being Compensation Case No.100 of 2012 has been filed by one Basanti Tirkey against M/s United Engineering Works, the petitioner herein before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranchi through a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, a claim for com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.