Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Jagarnath Bhagat (Oraon) – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Bhagat – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellants have preferred this Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 07.06.2017 and 27.06.2017 respectively, passed by learned Principal District Judge, Gumla in Title Appeal No. 15 of 2015, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2015 and 10.07.2015 respectively, passed by learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division)-II, Gumla, in Title Suit No. 15 of 2010 has been confirmed.
2. The case of the respondents/plaintiffs is that the respondents/plaintiffs are by caste “Oraon” and are governed by the “Oraon Customary Law” and as per this law, the daughters and widow are not entitled to inherit the property left by male Oraon. It has further been submitted that the lands of R.S. Khata No. 53, total area about 20.07 acres is jointly recorded in the name of Perla Oraon and Mani Oraon and separate shares of both the recorded tenants, have been shown in the Records of Right but in fact, there was no partition among the recorded tenants by metes and bound and even after the death of record
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article