SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Jhk) 633

ANANDA SEN
Poonam Jain – Appellant
Versus
Gauri Shanker Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Sashank Shekhar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the judgment dated 28.08.2013 and the decree dated 29.08.2013 by which the Title Suit No.16 of 1978, filed by the plaintiffs (appellants herein) has been dismissed.

2. A plaint was filed by the plaintiffs, which was registered as Title Suit No.16 of 1978, praying for a decree for partition of the properties mentioned in various schedules of the plaint and an order for separate possession. A decree for mesne profit was also prayed for with a direction for taking up of accounts.

3. The plaintiffs stated in their plaint that the parties are members of Joint Hindu Undivided Family and Khemraj Jain is the common ancestor. The parties are governed by Mitakshara School of Hindu Law. As per plaint, plaintiff Manilal Jain and Defendant Madan Lal Jain are brothers constituting HUF. The case of the plaintiffs is that parent business of Hindu Undivided Family is running in the name and style of M/s

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top