SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, RATNAKER BHENGRA
Indrajit Sinha @ Vicky son of Anup Kr. Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
The convicts, namely, Indrajit Sinha @ Vicky, Rajesh Kashmi @ Rajesh Reshmi and Rabish @ Shahzada Khan have challenged the judgment of conviction under sections 394, 411 and 302/34 IPC and the sentence inflicted upon them in S.T. Case No. 154/07 by the learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum (East).
2. In Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 295 of 2010, Indrajit Sinha @ Vicky and Rajesh Kashmi @ Rajesh Reshmi are the appellants and in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 166 of 2010, Rabish @ Shahzada Khan is the appellant.
3. The appellants have been sentenced to RI for life under section 302/34 IPC, RI for Ten years under section 394 IPC and RI for Two years under section 411 IPC.
4. On 21.11.2006, at about 13:30 hrs., a written report was submitted by Kishore Sinha, on the basis of which Telco P.S. Case No. 275/06 was registered under section 394/302 IPC against unknown. During the course of investigation, Aman Verma and Vikash Kumar @ Bittu, the tenants under the informant, disclosed that on the previous night the above-named accused persons had approached them and asked for bed and blanket for sleeping on the attic of the house. On the basis o
Navaneethakrishnan v. The State BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE reported in (2018) 16 SCC 161
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (1984) 4 SCC 116
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs. Sunil and Another reported in (2001) 1 SCC 652
Ghanashyam Das Vs. State of Assam reported in (2005) 13 SCC 387
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.