JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. V. P. Singh, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner along with Ms. Bandana Kumari Sinha, Advocate.

2. Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar, counsel appearing on behalf of the intervener.

3. Heard Mr. Raj Vardhan, counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2.

4. I.A. No. 9211 of 2017 has been filed on behalf of the intervener, namely, Kaushalya Devi who claims to be wife of Late Lalu Prasad. Counsel for the intervener submits that the case before the learned court below has been instituted on the basis of order dated 7th April, 2004 passed in B.S.E. Case No. 02 of 1997, wherein certain amount was directed to be paid to Lalu Prasad, who expired during the pendency of this case and the intervener is the wife of Lalu Prasad. He submits that the interest of the intervener is directly affected and accordingly intervener may be permitted to assist this Court.

5. Counsel for the petitioner has no objection, if the intervener is permitted to assist this Court.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the intervener is permitted to assist this Court on the basis of materials available on record and is added as Respondent No. 3. Office is directed to carry out necess