JUDGMENT :

Matter has been heard through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and/or visual quality.

2. This case is listed under the heading for ‘Orders (with defect)’. Defects ignored.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the defects, pointed out by the office, are ignored.

5. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being heard and disposed of at this stage itself.

6. This writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 25.03.2021 passed in O.A. No. 238 of 2021 by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna (Circuit Bench, Ranchi), whereby and whereunder according to writ petitioner grant of ad interim ex-parte stay, over order dated 01.03.2021 by which the writ petitioner was reverted back to the post of Technical Assistant, has been refused; further for quashing of order dated 01.03.2021 by which the petitioner has been reverted back to the post of Technical Assistant; and for quashing transfer order dated 18.02.2021; as also for direction upon the respondents to restore the petitioner on his earlier post, on whi