DEEPAK ROSHAN
Neeraj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing the order as contained in Memo No.1348 dated 09.05.2013 (Annexure11), whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service and also the order as contained in Memo No.4433 dated 25.12.2013 (Annexure-12), whereby the appeal of the petitioner has been rejected and the order of the dismissal has been affirmed.
3. The facts relevant to decide the instant writ application is that the petitioner was appointed to the post of Constable on 02.09.1999 and was transferred from Ranchi to Chatra district by order dated 11.06.2011 and pursuance thereto, he was relieved to join Chatra District. While the petitioner was posted at Chatra, he proceeded for casual leave for twenty five days on 07.06.2012 and he was supposed to join duty on 03.07.2012. However, during leave period the petitioner had developed some problem and was treated by one Dr. Ashok Kumar Prasad. However, when his condition subsequently deteriorated, he was referred to the specialist Dr. K. K. Sinha. Thus, though the petitioner was to report on his duty on 03.07.2012; he was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.