JUDGMENT :

With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.

2. This intra-court appeal is preferred against the order/judgment dated 23.02.2018 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 7084 of 2011 with W.P. (C) No. 7102 of 2011, whereby and whereunder the writ petitions were allowed and orders dated 22.10.2011 passed in Land Ceiling Revision Case No. 33/2009 and Land Ceiling Revision Case No. 34/2009; orders dated 19.09.2009 passed in Land Ceiling Appeal No. 05/2007-08 and Land Ceiling Appeal No. 12 of 2007-08; and orders dated 12.01.2007 passed in Land Ceiling Case No. 2/2005-06 and Land Ceiling Case No. 1/2005-06 were quashed and set aside.

4. The brief facts of the case, which are required to be enumerated herein for proper adjudication of the lis, are as under:

The writ petitioners, respondents nos. 2 to 4 herein, who are members of Hindu undivided family, purchased two landed property vide registered sale deed Nos. 589 of 2005 and 590 of 2005 both dated 31.03.2005.

The respondent no. 5, namely, Sitaram Sao (appellant herein) filed pre-emption applications, bein