JUDGMENT :

1. The matter has been heard through video conferencing with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. They have no complaint about any audio and visual connectivity.

2. This is an appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent directed against the order/judgment dated 30.08.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No.1112 of 2016 whereby and whereunder the writ petition has been dismissed by not interfering with the selection of respondent No.5 as Aaganbari Sevika.

3. The brief facts of the case which require to be enumerated reads as hereunder:

In pursuance to the meeting held on 05.03.2004, respondent No.5 was selected as Aaganbari Sevika for Jaridih East Centre taking into consideration her higher marks in Madhyama Examination. The appellant/writ-petitioner has questioned the appointment of respondent No.5 on the basis of the submission of forged certificate, therefore, she raised objection before the respondent No.4 to hold an enquiry but no steps were taken.

The appellant/writ-petitioner, from perusal of one letter bearing No.300 dated 11.04.2012 containing therein the certificates of Aaganbari Sevika employed in the entire district of Gi