SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Triloki Pandey, son of Late Rishi Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. Both these writ petitions are under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby and whereunder two notices dated 16.03.2013 issued under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public demand Recovery Act, 1914 against the writ petitioners initiating certificate proceeding being Certificate Case No. 4 of 12-13 [W.P.(C) No. 2429 of 2013] and Certificate Case No. 5 of 12-13 [W.P.(C) No. 2439 of 2013] claiming Rs.6,29,904/- as principal and interest amount as mentioned in view of appendix attached to the notice along with the interest @ 12% from the date of filing of proceeding, have been challenged.
3. Ms. Kanchan Kumari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in both these writ petitions, has submitted that against the notice issued under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public demand Recovery Act, 1914 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1914) to which response has also been filed by the Requisitioning Authority wherein at paragraphs 9 to 14 it has been contended that the requisition for recovery o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.