JUDGMENT :

1. Heard, Mr. Prashant Pallav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Kumari Rashmi, learned counsel for the respondent- State.

2. This writ petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition for quashing of order dated 30.09.2015 contained in annexure-7 and for quashing of order dated 23.06.2015 contained in annexure-8.

4. The petitioner is a land looser in the construction of the Punasi Dam Project. In terms of scheme of the Government, the petitioner was entitled for a job in the Irrigation Department, Deoghar and on verification of document, the respondent authority found the petitioner eligible and issued appointment letter dated 13.08.1992 contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition. The Government of Bihar stayed the appointment of the petitioner and others vide letter dated 14.09.1992 and the same was challenged in C.W.J.C. No. 11394 of 1992 before the Patna High Court wh