SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Rajesh Shankar, J.
Mukesh Kumar and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi and ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 864 of 2021
Decided On : 15-03-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, AG, Mr. Mohan Kumar Dubey, AC to AG

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 309 - Rule 4, Jharkhand Civil Services Examination Rules, 2021 - Advertisement - Claim any right of appointment - Jharkhand Combined Civil Service Competitive Exam mentioned in Advertisement No- same will lead to ouster of several aspirants including petitioners from zone of consideration due to non-holding of examinations which ought to be held year-wise regularly and continuity of age relaxation has been broken without any valid reason there galloping jump has damaged their prospects due to non-compliance of previous rule petitioners have also prayed for issuance of direction upon respondents to adhere to previously adopted consecutively of age relaxation as is evident from Advertisement No- that there may not be any erosion of employment avenues in state due to their lackadaisical omission to comply mandate of their own framed –Held, Appellants who are aspirants for direct recruitment have no right for appointment merely because at one point of time vacancies were advertised- candidates such as appellants cannot claim any right of appointment merely for reason that they responded to an advertisement published - Even after completion of selection process candidates even on merit list do not have any vested right to seek appointment only for reason that their names appear State is under no legal duty to fill up all or any of vacancies- However it does not mean that State has licence of acting in an arbitrary manner- decision not to fill up vacancies has to be taken bona fide for appropriate reasons- And if vacancies or any of them are filled up State is bound to respect comparative merit of candidates as reflected at recruitment test and no discrimination can be permitted- This correct position has been consistently followed by this Court and we do not find any discordant note in decisions point of time any vacancy was advertised does not by itself gives aspirant to be appointed on a particular post- Even after completion of selection process candidates coming in merit list do not have any vested right to seek appointment only for reason that their names appear in same - Petition dismissed

ORDER :

The present writ petition is taken up today through Video conferencing.

The present writ petition has been filed for declaring the proviso to rule 4 of the Jharkhand Civil Services Examination Rules, 2021 as contrary to rule 3(v) (wrongly written as rule 3(iv) in the writ petition) of the said Rule. Further prayer has been made for declaring that there is an abrupt departure of cut-off date for counting the upper age limit to appear in the Jharkhand Combined Civil Service Competitive Exam 2021 mentioned in Advertisement No. 01/2021 as the same will lead to ouster of several aspirants including the petitioners from the zone of consideration due to non-holding of the examinations which ought to be held year-wise regularly and the continuity of age relaxation has been broken without any valid reason thereby 5 years galloping jump has damaged their prospects due to non-compliance of the previous rule 3 [now rule 3(v)] of Rules, 2021. The petitioners have also prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to adhere to the previously adopted consecutivity of age relaxation as is evident from Advertisement No. 01/2020 so that there may not be any erosion of employment avenues in the state due to their lackadaisical omission to comply the mandate of their own framed Rules, 1951 and 2021 for those candidates who have adversely been affected from the year 2011 to 2015.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Advertisement No. 01/2020 was published in the year 2020 for Combined Civil Service Competitive Examination-2017, 2018 and 2019 in the State of Jharkhand, wherein suitable relaxation was given for computation of upper age limit as 2011 for all the clubbed vacancies following the pattern adopted in earlier six consecutive yearly vacancies. However, due to Covid-19 pandemic, the said vacancy could not be finalized and in the meantime, the Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Examination Rules, 2021 was notified in the month of January, 2021 which was to be effective prospectively. Thereafter, the JPSC advertised Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Competitive Exam, 2021 through JPSC website. As per Clause 4 of the said advertisement, the upper age limit has to be calculated on the basis of the cut-off date as 01.08.2016. It is further submitted that it would be evident on examining the earlier rule vis-à-vis the new rule that the provision of clubbing the vacancies for two (or more) years together which has been made for the first time by reasons of the proviso to rule 4 of the Rules, 2021 is de-hors the rules itself. It is a settled law that if any vacancy arises in a particular year but the same cannot be filled up for some reason or the other, then all the eligible candidates who are left over will have the subsisting right under Article 16 of the Constitution of India to be considered for that post and any attempt to exclude those candidates shall be an aberration of the constitutional mandate. It is also submitted that though the State has the discretionary power to fix the cut-off date for computing the age, yet the said discretion cannot be exercised arbitrarily, rather must be based on rational thinking. It is further submitted that the petitioners do not doubt the intention of the State which may be bonafide, but it has not reached the core of the issue, rather the same is so superficial that it has not even been able to touch the mantle.

3. Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, the learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent-State while countering the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that Rules, 2021 has been notified by the State Government in order to remove the deficiencies in the earlier rules to hold combined competitive examination every year. It is also submitted that vide resolution no. 7052 dated 17.08.2016, the cut-off dates for the calculation of the upper and lower age limit in the Combined Civil Services Examination, 2016 were fixed as 01.08.2010 and 01.08.2016 r

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top