IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.N. PATHAK, J.
The Management of Jamshedpur Worker' College Employees Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. through its Secretary Rajiv Kumar S/o Sri B.N. Prasad – Petitioner
Versus
The Workman Sri Jitendra Kumar Tiwari S/o Sri Shivnath Tiwari – Respondent
W.P. (L) No. 3824 of 2010
Decided On : 18-06-2021
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25-F - Bihar and Orissa Cooperative Society Act, 1935 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Clerk-cum-Accountant - Termination from service - Issue of maintainability - Prayer for quashing Award passed in Reference Case by which order of dismissal of respondent as Clerk-cum-Accountant has been held to be illegal and termination order has been set aside and workman is directed to be reinstated to his post along with 50% backwages with all other consequential benefits - It has also been directed that workman shall be deemed to be in continuity of service.
Finding of the Court:
In absence of same, no interference is warranted. In view of facts and circumstances discussed hereinabove and for the reasons expressed above, this Court is in full agreement with the Award passed by the Tribunal and as such is not in a position to take a different view what has been taken by the Tribunal Court do not find any infirmity or any illegality in the impugned Award. No interference is warranted by this Court in the impugned Award - Orders of Tribunal can only be interfered if there is gross illegality and the order is perverse and without jurisdiction.
Result: Writ Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
S.N. PATHAK, J.
1. In view of outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, case has been taken up through Video Conferencing on various dates and finally on 01.02.2021, it has been reserved for final Judgment. Concerned lawyers have no objection with regard to the proceeding, which were held through Video Conferencing. They have no complaint in respect to the audio and video clarity and quality.
2. The petitioner-Management of Jamshedpur Worker’ College Employees Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. has knocked door of this Court with a prayer for quashing the Award dated 28.04.2010, passed in Reference Case No. 16 of 2002 by which order of dismissal of respondent as Clerk-cum-Accountant has been held to be illegal and the termination order has been set aside and the workman is directed to be reinstated to his post along with 50% backwages with effect from 11.01.2001 with all other consequential benefits. It has also been directed that the workman shall be deemed to be in continuity of service.
3. Fact of the case in brief is that the respondent-workman joined the service on 28.04.1987 and was the permanent employee of the petitioner-Management. His services was confirmed to the post of Accountant-cum-Office Assistant on and from 17.04.1990 and confirmation was duly approved by Assistant Registrar of the management vide letter no. 938, dated 31.12.1994. However, without any rhyme or reason, vide letter no. 25/2001, dated 11.01.2001, issued by the Secretary of the petitioner-Management, the respondent-workman was informed that he has been terminated with immediate effect and another person was engaged in his place. Being aggrieved, the respondent-workman represented before the Management on 20.01.2001 but no response was made to him. Being aggrieved, the respondent-workman raised Industrial disputes against his termination from the service. The appropriate Government, vide Notification No. 1/ Shram-D-01-31/2001, LE&T-796, dated 14.12.2002, referred the matter before the Industrial Tribunal with the following terms:
4. After receipt of notification from appropriate Government, notices were issued to both sides, who appeared and filed their respective written statements/reply. Thereafter, the following issues were framed by the Tribunal:
(ii) Whether the instant reference is barred by the principles of res-judicata?
(iii) Whether workman Jitendra Kumar Tiwary committed any misconduct and compelled the management to take drastic steps to terminate the services of the workman?
(iv) To what relief/relieves, workman is entitled to receive?
5. After hearing the parties, considering facts and circumstances of the case, evidences adduced by the parties, the reference was answered in favour of the workman and against the Management. After setting aside the letter of termination issued against the workman, the Tribunal further directed to reinstate the respondent-workman to his post along with 50% backwages from the date of termination till the date of reinstatement i.e. from 11.01.2001 and all other consequential benefits. The Tribunal further directed that the workman shall be deemed to be continue in service without any break. Being aggrieved, the petitioner-Management has knocked door of this Court.
6. Mr. Saurav Arun, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-Management submits that Jamshedpur Worker’ College Employees Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. is a registered Society under the Bihar and Orissa Cooperative Society Act, 1935 with the object for promoti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.