JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard, Mr. Afaque Rashidi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Shivani Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondent-State.

2. This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. Petitioner has filed this instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for direction upon the respondents to lodge F.I.R. on the basis of written complaint made by the petitioner.

4. Grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of written submission of the petitioner, F.I.R. has not been lodged.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is right of the petitioner to lodge F.I.R. and the respondents are liable to lodge F.I.R, which has not been done in the hand in hand.

6. Ms. Shivani Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that approaching the Hon’ble High Court by filing application under Article 226 of the Constitution is not an appropriate remedy. She submits that a proceedin