JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.

2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing and setting aside the order dated 11.02.2009 issued by respondent No.5, whereby the services of the petitioner has been terminated and also the appellate order dated 01.10.2009 passed by respondent no.2, whereby the appeal of the petitioner has been rejected.

The petitioner has also prayed for reinstatement of his service with back-wages and other consequential benefits.

3. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the instant writ application is that petitioner was initially appointed on 05.09.1980 to the post of Piece Rated Employee under the VRS for male workers wherein there is a provision for employment of the dependent in case of male employee applied for VRS. When the petitioner was performing his duties to the post of Munshi, a charge-sheet dated 10.12.1998 was issued to him alleging that he obtained employment claiming himself to be his son-in-law of one “Sado” although he did not have any such family relationship with him. For proper appreciation of this case, the charge-sheet issued against this petitioner is quoted h