RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Meena Singh, W/o. Satish Chandra Rana – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter was done through video conferencing and there was no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. The instant intra-court appeal is under Clause 10 of Letters Patent directed against the order/judgment dated 05.07.2018 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No. 3754 of 2017 whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge has declined to interfere with the decision of the Director, Ranchi Institute of Neuro-Psychiatry & Allied Sciences (in short RINPAS) in making payment of Rs.10,000/- per month honorarium, which, according to the petitioner, is contrary to the decision of the authority as contained in Resolution No.2452/F dated 26.11.2011 and Resolution No. 1243/F dated 28.04.2016 which have been approved by the Management Committee, RINPAS.
3. The brief facts of the case which are required to be enumerated read as under : -
The writ petitioner of W.P.(S) No. 3754 of 2017 was appointed as Staff Nurse Grade “A” vide Notification No.1719(6) dated 28.10.1968 issued und
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.