SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 219

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Naveen Topno – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sunil Singh.
For the Respondent: Mr. Someshwar Roy.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Sunil Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Someshwar Roy, learned counsel for the State.

2. This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. The present petition has been filed for quashing of orders dated 09.06.2020 and 19.10.2020 whereby non-bailable warrant of arrest and process under section 82 Cr.P.C. respectively have been issued against the petitioners in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No. 43/2020, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M. Latehar.

4. Mr. Sunil Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that without following the parameters as indicated under warrant of arrest and section 82 Cr.P.C. non-bailable warrant of arrest as well as process under section 82 Cr.P.C. have been issued as there is no indication of time and place. He submits that non-bailable warrant of arrest as well as process under section 82 Cr.P.C. have not been issued in compliance of jud

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top