SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Naveen Topno – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Heard Mr. Sunil Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Someshwar Roy, learned counsel for the State.
2. This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.
3. The present petition has been filed for quashing of orders dated 09.06.2020 and 19.10.2020 whereby non-bailable warrant of arrest and process under section 82 Cr.P.C. respectively have been issued against the petitioners in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No. 43/2020, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M. Latehar.
4. Mr. Sunil Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that without following the parameters as indicated under warrant of arrest and section 82 Cr.P.C. non-bailable warrant of arrest as well as process under section 82 Cr.P.C. have been issued as there is no indication of time and place. He submits that non-bailable warrant of arrest as well as process under section 82 Cr.P.C. have not been issued in compliance of jud
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.