SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Jhk) 898

S.N.PATHAK
Kumud Patar Munda, son of late Smabat Patar Munda – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. K. K. Ambastha, Advocate
For the Respondent: J.C. to A.A.G.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioners are claiming regularization to the post of Peon, as they have been appointed sometimes in the year 1988, 1989 and 1990, in view of resolution dated 18.07.2009.

2. As per the factual matrix, petitioners were appointed as Peon on daily wages in the year 1988, 1989 and 1990 respectively. It is stated that petitioners were appointed on contract basis w.e.f. 27.12.2007 against the vacant post of Peon under the Department of Finance vide Memo No. 442 dated 15.02.2008. It is further stated that from time to time the salary of the petitioners were fixed by the respondent-authorities in view of different circular of the Finance Department. It is the specific case of the petitioners that they are seeking regularization in view of the resolution dated 18.07.2009 which talks about regularization of services of such employees who have put in regular service for more than 10 years against the vacant and sanctioned posts. It is further stated that pursuant to aforesaid resolution of the Government, services of 20 similarly situated persons have been regularized by the respondent-authorities but in case of present petitioners, despite there being vacant posts of Peon, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top