RAJESH KUMAR
Fuleshwar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. R.C.P. Sah, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Tapas Roy, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. This appeal is filed against the judgment of conviction dated 25.02.2006 and order of sentence dated 27.02.2006 passed by Mohammed Kasim, Addl. Sessions Judge (F.T.C.)-II, Seraikella in Sessions Trial No.105 of 2005, whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven (07) years and a fine of Rs.2000/-. In default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.
3. The criminal law has been put into motion by lodging FIR by the victim-Kumari Seema Behra by submitting written complaint in her own handwriting and the same was registered as Kharsawan P.S. Case No.14 of 2005 dated 15.04.2005. It has been alleged that when the victim was a student of class-8, the appellant used to follow her. Subsequently the accused had established physical relation with her against her will and on the pretext of marriage continued for about two years. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that before lodging FIR,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.