SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Jhk) 1035

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.
Ram Kharia son of Late Lodo Kharia - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Opp. Party
Cr. Revision No. 1112 of 2014
Decided On : 31-08-2020

The court clarified the criteria for grievous hurt under Section 320 of IPC and its application to the petitioner's case.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code - Assault - Sections 323, 324, 325 - Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act - Sections 3, 4

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was convicted for assaulting the informant with an axe, identifying her as a witch, and causing injuries. The trial court found the injuries to be simple in nature, but the lower appellate court upheld the conviction under Section 325 of IPC.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the injuries did not meet the criteria for grievous hurt under Section 320 of IPC, and thus set aside the conviction under Section 325 of IPC. The petitioner was convicted under Section 324 of IPC instead, with modified sentencing.

Issues: Conviction under Section 325 of IPC, nature of injuries, modification of sentence, period of custody

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the injuries did not meet the criteria for grievous hurt under Section 320 of IPC, leading to the setting aside of the conviction under Section 325 of IPC and modification of the sentence under Section 324 of IPC.

Final Decision: The petitioner's conviction under Section 325 of IPC was set aside, and the petitioner was convicted under Section 324 of IPC with modified sentencing. All sentences were directed to run concurrently.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. A. K. Chaturvedy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard Mr. Bibhuti Shankar Sahay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State.

3. The petitioner was convicted vide judgment and order of sentence dated 19.02.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gumla in G.R. Case No. 500/2005 (T.R. No. 156/2011), whereby the petitioner was found guilty for offence punishable under Sections 323 and 325 of Indian Penal Code and also under Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act. He was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- for offence under Section 323 of IPC; sentenced for two and a half years and to pay fine of Rs. 5000/- for offence under Section 325 of IPC; sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 months and 4 months for offence under Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act with a fine of Rs. 500/- and Rs. 1000/- respectively. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

4. This criminal revision application has been filed against the judgment and order of sentence dated 30.03.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in Cri. Appeal No. 11/2011, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed with some modification of sentence. As per the appellate order, the modified sentence under Section 323 of Indian Penal Code, is simple imprisonment for a period of one year with fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment to undergo simple imprisonment for two months; under Section 325 of Indian Penal Code to undergo simple imprisonment for two years and pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment to undergo simple imprisonment for six months; under Section 3 of the Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act, 1999 to undergo simple imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and under Section 4 of Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act, 1999 to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 4 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in case of default in payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment of one month each and all the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

Arguments of the petitioner

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the impugned judgments passed by the learned courts below are perverse, so far as the conviction of the petitioner under Section 325 of Indian Penal Code is concerned. He submits that the maximum punishment in this case has been given under Section 325 of Indian Penal Code for two years and so far as the offence under Section 323 is concerned, the punishment has been given for one year. He also submits that the punishment under Section 3/4 of Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act has already been undergone by the petitioner. He submits that as recorded in the trial court’s judgment, P.W.-6 is the medical witness who had examined the informant/victim and it has been recorded that all the injuries were simple in nature and caused by hard and blunt object. He submits that as the injuries are simple in nature, the petitioner could not have been convicted under Section 325 of Indian Penal Code as the condition precedent for conviction under Section 325 of IPC is that the injury should be grievous. During the course of argument, it was submitted that at best the conviction could be sustained under Section 324 of IPC and not under Section 325 of IPC. He submits that the maximum punishment under Section 325 of IPC is 7 years and the maximum punishment under Section 324 is 3 years and the petitioner has been convicted for two years under Section 325 of IPC and accordingly, if the conviction is converted to offence under Section 324 of IPC, then the sentence may also be modified.

6. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period from 28.07.2005 to 25.10.2005 at the stage of trial and thereafter at least from 17.10.2014 to 27.02.

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top