JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard Mr. Hardeo Prasad Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State.

3. This criminal revision application has been filed challenging the legality, correctness and propriety of the order dated 24.2.2014 passed in Criminal Appeal No.05 of 2011, corresponding to Koderma (T) P.S. Case No.420 of 2002, further corresponding to G.R. No.696 of 2002 (T.R. No.1125 of 2011), whereby and where under the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge, Sessions Court No. – I, Koderma has been pleased to uphold the decision of the learned trial court for which the appeal was preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.03.2011 passed by learned S.D.J.M, Koderma.

4. The petitioner has been convicted under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304-A of Indian Penal Code for six months imprisonment each and it has been directed that all the sentences would run concurrently.

Arguments of the Petitioner

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his arguments on the legality and validity of the conviction of the petitioner under Section 304 (A) of Indian