RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Shilpa Dalmia – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand Public Service Commission through its Chairman having its office at Circular Road, Ahirtoli, Ranchi, P. O Ranchi, P. S. – Kotwali – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:
(ii). To stay the Issuance of Appointments letters to the Finally Selected Candidates and Reserve One (1) Seat for the Petitioner as the Final Result declares the selection of 107 Candidates in total, until the Final Disposal of the Writ and the Ascertainment of Petitioners Right.
(iii). To Quash Non-Acceptance or Rejection of Petitioner’s Candidature as an “Outstanding Sports Person”, pursuant to Horizontal Reservation of Sports Quota under the Advertisement – 12/2018, as claimed by the Petitioner and duly acknowledged by the Respondent no. 1 JPSC.
(iv).To dire
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Lord Scarman in Nottinghamshire County Council v. Secretary of State for the Environment 1986 AC 240
R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
U.V. Mahadkar v. Subhash Anand Chavan
Bedanga Talukdar vs. Saifudullah Khan & Ors. (2011) 12 SCC 85
Air India Ltd. vs. Cochin International Airport Ltd. reported in (2000) 2 SCC 617
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.