JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.

2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing and setting aside the order as contained in Memo No.2677 dated 18.05.2010 whereby the respondent No.3 has cancelled the Assured Career Progression (ACP) benefits already given to this petitioner. The petitioner has also assailed the order as contained in Memo No. 3034(s)WE dated 3.6.2010 whereby the ACP benefits already given to this petitioner were directed to be recovered.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this Court towards the impugned order dated 18.05.2010 (Annexure-6) and submits that a completely non-speaking order has been passed by the concerned respondent and simply in two lines it has been held that since the petitioner has not passed any departmental examination as such he is not entitled for ACP benefits.

Learned counsel further draws attention of this Court towards Annexure-3 which is the letter of Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department dated 15.05.1992 which indicates that if a person crossed 50 years of age and there is no examination in past five years then he would be exempted f