DEEPAK ROSHAN
Shobh Naryan Singh @ Shov Naryan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard through V.C.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for quashing the order dated 25.10.99 passed by the respondent No.3 (Annexures-4), whereby the petitioner has been removed from service.
The petitioner has further assailed the appellate order dated 19th May, 2000 passed by respondent No.2 and also the revisional order as contained in letter No. 3084 dated 26.11.2002, whereby the appellate authority as well as revisional authority has rejected the claim of the petitioner for reinstatement.
3. The brief facts as disclosed in the instant writ application is that the petitioner was appointed in the post of Constable and while he was posted at BSL, Bokaro, the petitioner was served with a charge-sheet under Memo No. 15014 dated 29.04.1999. The petitioner denied the entire allegation made against him and submitted his reply. Thereafter, a proper departmental enquiry was held and the enquiry officer submitted his report to the disciplinary authority holding therein that the charge against the this petitioner was proved and on the basis of the said enquiry report; the disciplinary authority passed the order of removal of the petitioner f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.