RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Abhishek Kumar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. The case has been listed under the heading for “Orders (with defect)”.
3. Perused the office note as also stamp reporting dated 29.07.2021.
4. The defect, pointed out by the office, is ignored.
5. It has also been brought to the notice of this Court that the appeal has been filed within time.
6. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellants does not want to press the application for condonation of delay (I.A. No. 6621 of 2020).
7. Accordingly, I.A. No. 6621 of 2020 is dismissed as not pressed.
L.P.A. No. 416 of 2020
8. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is being heard and is disposed of at this stage.
9. The instant intra-court appeal is preferred against the order/judgment dated 19.10.2020 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 2628 of 2018, whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge while allowing the writ petition has held that Resolution as contained in Memo No.9/Chi.Maha-07-08/2014 (part-1)-179(9) dated 24th April, 2018 cannot be made applicable to the petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.