SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 384

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, JJ.
The State of Jharkhand - Appellant
Versus
Dr. Abhishek Kumar Singh - Respondent
L.P.A. No. 416 of 2020 with I.A. No. 6620, 6621 of 2020
Decided on : 06-08-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Adv
For the Respondent:Ms. Swati Shalini, Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 and 162 - MD/MS/Postgraduate/Diploma Courses - Admission - Counselling Process - Instant intra-court appeal is preferred against order/judgment passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) whereby and where under learned Single Judge while allowing writ petition has held that Resolution as contained in Memo cannot be made applicable to petitioners by enforcing it retrospectively and as such bonds executed by them in terms of said Resolution were quashed and set aside - Brief facts of case, which are required to be enumerated herein for proper adjudication of lis, are as under National Board of Examinations (NBE) published an advertisement for National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Postgraduate), for admission to MD/MS/Postgraduate/Diploma Courses, - Writ petitioners appeared and were declared qualified in said entrance test and thereafter counselling process was conducted by Medical Counselling Committee - After Completion of counselling process of several rounds, petitioner were found to be successful and accordingly they opted for Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, last date for admission as well as leaving course after completion of Round of counselling was fixed – Held, Court by invoking power conferred under Article 226 of Constitution of India by filing writ petition being W.P. (C) for quashing Resolution as contained in Memo as also new format of bond issued under signature of Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education & Family Welfare, which was allowed holding that Resolution as contained in Memo cannot be made applicable to petitioners by enforcing it retrospectively and as such bonds executed by them in terms of said Resolution were quashed and set aside, which is subject matter of present intra-court appeal - learned Single Judge has delved upon applicability of Resolution, 2018 prospectively, Court find no reason to interfere with impugned order passed by learned Single Judge. – At court juncture, learned counsel for writ petitioners has submitted that original testimonials are still with appellants-State as such they may be directed to release same in favour of writ petitioners – Court After considering the submissions advanced by the parties, are not passing any specific direction rather it is left open to the one or the other writ petitioners that if they are willing to continue under the contract, they may do so if the State wants and the order passed by this Court will not come in their way - Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.

2. The case has been listed under the heading for “Orders (with defect)”.

3. Perused the office note as also stamp reporting dated 29.07.2021.

4. The defect, pointed out by the office, is ignored.

5. It has also been brought to the notice of this Court that the appeal has been filed within time.

6. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellants does not want to press the application for condonation of delay (I.A. No. 6621 of 2020).

7. Accordingly, I.A. No. 6621 of 2020 is dismissed as not pressed.

L.P.A. No. 416 of 2020

8. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is being heard and is disposed of at this stage.

9. The instant intra-court appeal is preferred against the order/judgment dated 19.10.2020 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 2628 of 2018, whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge while allowing the writ petition has held that Resolution as contained in Memo No.9/Chi.Maha-07-08/2014 (part-1)-179(9) dated 24th April, 2018 cannot be made applicable to the petitioners by enforcing it retrospectively and as such bonds executed by them in terms of said Resolution were quashed and set aside.

10. The brief facts of the case, which are required to be enumerated herein for proper adjudication of the lis, are as under:

On 17th October, 2017, the National Board of Examinations (NBE) published an advertisement for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Postgraduate), for admission to MD/MS/Postgraduate/Diploma Courses, 2018. The writ petitioners appeared and were declared qualified in the said entrance test and thereafter counselling process was conducted by the Medical Counselling Committee under the Director General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. After completion of counselling process of several rounds, the petitioner were found to be successful and accordingly they opted for Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi (in short ‘RIMS, Ranchi’). The last date for admission as well as leaving the course after completion of 2nd Round of counselling was fixed as 23rd April, 2018.

At the time of admission, Resolution No.9/Chi.Maha-07-08/14-230(9)/Ranchi dated 22nd December, 2015 (in short ‘Resolution, 2015’) was in vogue, as such they signed bond as per terms and conditions of the Resolution, 2015 and submitted all the documents and certificates in original in the institution (RIMS) i.e. on 23rd April, 2018.

However, on the next date i.e., 24th April, 2018, the another Resolution, as contained in Memo no.9/Chi.Maha-07-08/2014 (part-1)-179(9) (in short ‘Resolution, 2018’), was issued under the signature of Principal Secretary-Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand making amendment to Resolution of the year 2015. According to the writ petitioners, as per Clause (iii) of the Resolution, 2018, bonds were required to be taken from all the students of Postgraduate (Medical/MDS) courses seeking admission in the Medical Colleges situated within the State of Jharkhand to the effect that an amount of Rs.30 lacs was to be recovered from those students who did not intend to take admission after selection. Further, Clause (iv) of the Resolution, 2018 provided that a bond would be taken from all the students of Postgraduate (Medical/M.D.S.) courses to the effect that those students who intended to leave the courses after taking admission or in the midst of academic session, they would be required to deposit Rs.30 lacs along with the amount of stipend as well as other allowances received by them during the course period in one go. As per Clause (V) of Resolution, 2018, the students after completion of Postgraduate course have to compulsorily serve under the Government of Jharkhand for a period of three years, failing which an amount of Rs.30 lacs along with the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top