JUDGMENT :

With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.

2. In compliance of order of dated 23.06.2021, explanation has been submitted by Dealing Assistant and Section Officer as also by the Assistant Registrar of the concerned Section.

3. Perused the explanation.

4. Let the Registrar General examine the matter as to whether any existing rule or precedence of scrutiny of supplementary affidavit filed subsequently is there or not or whether the same could be placed before the Bench without examining as to whether there is some defect in the affidavit or not?

Thereafter, place the matter before the Chief Justice on the administrative side for taking appropriate decision in this regard.

L.P.A. No. 381 of 2020

5. The instant intra-court appeal is preferred against the order/judgment dated 03.11.2020 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. (S) No. 395 of 2020, whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge refused to interfere with order dated 23.06.2017, by which the application of the writ petitioner seeking Voluntary Retirement has been rejected; as also order dated 03.08.2