RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Prabir Kumar Roy, son of Late Sursa Kant Roy – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Cocking Coal Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. The instant intra-court appeal is preferred against the order/judgment dated 24.07.2020 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. (S) No. 92 of 2020, whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition has refused to interfere with order dated 06.08.2019, by which departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner and further refused to stay departmental proceeding which was initiated against the petitioner vide order dated 06.08.2019.
3. The brief facts of the case, which are required to be enumerated herein for proper adjudication of the lis, are as under:
The writ petitioner was appointed as Accounts Trainee in regular establishment of M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited (in short ‘B.C.C.L.') vide order dated 18.11.1987. Pursuant thereto, the writ petitioner joined the said post on 19.11.1987 and from time to time he was promoted and vide order dated 19.05.2014, he was promoted from the post of Senior Cashier to Chief Cashier.
While working as such, a written report was lodge
Capt. M. Paul Anthony Vs. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. And Another [(1999) 3 SCC 679]
Depot Manager A.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vrs. Md. Yousuf Miya and Ors.
State of Rajasthan Vs. B.K. Meena and Others
Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. Vs. Girish V. and Others
State of Bihar & Ors vs. Phulpari Kumari [(2020) 2 SCC 130]
Shesh Nath Choubey Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board, through its Chairman
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.