IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Ananda Sen, J.
Tukeshwari Devi wife of Sri Shivnandan Mahto - Appellant
Versus
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director and ors. - Respondent
M.A. No. 118 of 2016
Decided On : 25-08-2021
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 279, 304A – Offence of Death by negligence - Rush driving or riding on a public way - Tribunal, thereafter, on basis of evidence, has held that accident had occurred due to rash and negligent driving of vehicle Maruti Omni, resulting in death of deceased deceased was at time of accident. - Vehicle was insured with Insurance Company. Thereafter, Tribunal awarded a sum of as compensation and in addition to that has also awarded a sum of towards love and affection as also a further sum of towards funeral expenses - Tribunal directed Insurance Company to pay aforesaid amount of within 30 days from date of award along with interest at rate of 8% from date of filing of claim application till date of award – Held, Deceased was whereas in case, which was before Hon’ble Supreme Court, deceased was - Thus, there is not much difference in both cases - In instant case Tribunal has granted a sum of towards compensation to be paid along with interest at rate of 8% per annum, whereas Hon’ble Supreme Court had granted Thus Court considering judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court is of opinion that amount which has been awarded by Tribunal with interest thereupon is just and fair compensation - Appeal Dismissed.
ORDER :
Claimant-appellant has preferred this appeal for enhancement of the awarded amount vide award dated 26.03.2015 passed by the District Judge-III-cum-Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Bermo at Tenughat, Bokaro in Motor Accident Claim Case No.51 of 2011.
2. I have heard the counsel for the appellant, counsel appearing for the Insurance Company and the counsel appearing for the owner of the vehicle.
3. The case arises out of motor vehicle accident, which had occurred on 14.01.2011, when the deceased Shashi Kumar Mahato was dashed by an unnumbered maruti omni van which was driven rashly and negligently by Lakshman Nayak, thereafter on the way to taking him to the hospital, the deceased died. Kasmar Police Station Case No.4 of 2011 was registered for offences under Sections 279, 304A of the Indian Penal Code. The deceased, as per the claim application, was aged about 13 years. According to the claimants they were entitled to a compensation amount of Rs.3,50,000/- along with interest.
4. The Insurance Company had appeared before the Tribunal, but did not file any written statement and was debarred from filing any written statement by order dated 14.12.2012. Opposite parties No.2 and 3 had never appeared before the Tribunal and the claim case proceeded ex-parte.
5. On the basis of the claim application, the Tribunal framed four issues, the probable translation of the said issues in English are as under:
II. Whether the claimants got valid cause of action for the present case?
III. Whether the claimants are entitled to the compensation amount claimed by them and to what extent they are entitled to get the same?
IV. Whether the claimants are entitled to get the compensation as claimed?
6. Four witnesses were examined on behalf of the claimants and several documents were exhibited, which were marked as Exhibits 1, 2, 3, ‘X’ and ‘X/1’.
7. The Tribunal, thereafter, on the basis of the evidence, has held that the accident had occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle Maruti Omni, resulting in death of the deceased Shashi Kumar Mahto. The deceased was aged 13 years at the time of accident. The vehicle was insured with the Insurance Company. Thereafter, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.3,50,000/-as compensation and in addition to that has also awarded a sum of Rs.15,000/-towards love and affection as also a further sum of Rs.10,000/-towards funeral expenses. The Tribunal directed the Insurance Company to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs.3,75,000/-within 30 days from the date of the award along with interest at the rate of 8% from the date of filing of the claim application till the date of award.
8. Counsel appearing for the claimants submits that the deceased was 13 years and was having bright future, as such, the Tribunal could not have denied future prospect to the claimants. Counsel appearing for the claimants further submits that the Tribunal has erred in allowing only a meager sum of Rs.10,000/-on account of funeral expenses and a sum of Rs.15,000/-towards the loss of love and affection, which are not in consonance with the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Pranay Sethi reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680. He also claims that the claimants are entitled to interest at the rate of 12% from the date of the claim application till realization.
9. Counsel for the Insurance Company submits that admittedly, when the deceased was 13 years, his income cannot be assessed nor the claimants can get any amount towards future prospect. He relied upon a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajendra Singh & Others versus National Insurance Company Limited & Others reported in (2020) 7 SCC 256.
10. This is an appeal by the appellant-claimant, claiming for enhancement of compensation. From the submission of the parties and from the records, it is clear that the deceased was aged 13 years at the time
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.