SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 443

RAJESH SHANKAR
Samsad Alam – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kaushalendra Prasad.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shilpi.

ORDER :

1. The present case is taken up today through video conferencing.

2. The present writ petition was initially filed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to restrain the construction over the land appertaining to Khata No. 21, plot nos. 729 and 734, Mouza-Darida, P.S. Tamar, Thana No. 186, District Ranchi measuring total area of 14.46 acres (hereinafter to be referred as “the said land”).

3. Subsequently, by way of an interlocutory application being I.A. No. 1479 of 2021, the petitioner has sought amendment in the writ petition to the extent of adding some state authorities as party respondents and making additional prayer to set aside the order dated 19.09.2019 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bundu, Ranchi under section 144 of Cr.P.C. in Case No. M-15/2019. The petitioner has also prayed in the said interlocutory application to set aside the notice as contained in memo no. 592(ii) dated 16.09.2020 issued by the Circle Officer, Tamar Ranchi whereby a date was fixed for demarcation of the said land. Further prayer has also been made in the said interlocutory application for issuance of direction upon the respondents to restore the possession of the said land in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top