SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 450

RAJESH SHANKAR
Md. Muslim Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A. Allam.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mohan Kumar Dubey.

ORDER :

1. This case is taken up through video conferencing.

2. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects, as pointed out by the office, is ignored.

3. The petitioner, who is tenant of the premises in question (shop), has filed the present writ petition for quashing the order dated 5th July, 2019 passed by the House Rent Controller-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Ranchi-respondent no. 4 in J.B.C. Case no. 114 of 2016, whereby the said case filed by Brigadier Ravi Kumar-respondent no. 5 (landlord of the premises in question) under Section 19(1)(e) of the Jharkhand Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 2011 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the Act 2011’) has been allowed, directing the petitioner to hand over the possession of the premises in question to the respondent no. 5 within a fortnight. Further challenge has been made to the order dated 5th March, 2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi (Appellate authority) respondent no. 3 in J.B.C. Appeal No. 7 R15 of 2019-20, whereby the order passed by the respondent no. 4 has been upheld.

4. Mr. A. Allam, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that main reason for filing the pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top