SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 467

RAJESH SHANKAR
Rameshwar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Binod Singh.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mohan Kumar Dubey.

ORDER :

1. This case is taken up through video conferencing.

2. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects, as pointed out by the office, is ignored for the present.

3. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the letters/notices dated 3rd September, 2021 (Annexure-2 series to the writ petition) issued to the petitioners under the signature of the Circle Officer, Daru-respondent no. 4, whereby the said respondent has ordered for demolition of the residential houses of the petitioners on 13th September, 2021 i.e. today, as according to him, the petitioners did not submit relevant revenue documents relating to the land in question. The petitioners have also made other related prayers.

4. Mr. Binod Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the land appertaining to Khata No. 77, plot nos. 153 and 70, measuring an area of 3.33 acres of village Jinga, P.O. Maheshra, P.S. Daru, District Hazaribagh has been recorded in the name of Khuslal Mahto, son of Thanu Mahto, as would be evident from the Register-II being maintained in the State Government’s web portal. Ignoring the said fact, the respondent no. 4 issued notices to the petitioners under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top