RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Mandakini Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Development Commissioner (Handicraft), Ministry of Textile, Government of India, West Block, P. O and P. S. , District R. K. Puram, New Delhi – Respondent
ORDER :
With consent of the parties, hearing of the matters have been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. Both these intra-court appeals filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent since arises out of common order/judgment dated 18.09.2019 passed in W.P. (C) No. 6356 of 2014, whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge, while disposing of the writ petition, has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for direction upon the respondents-Union of India to grant financial assistance to the writ petitioner from the month of June, 2009 to November, 2011 but allowed the claim of the writ petitioner pertaining to direction upon the respondents to extend financial assistance from March, 2016 to December, 2018, and since involve common questions of facts and law, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, both the appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order/judgment.
3. L.P.A. No. 742 of 2019 has been preferred by the writ petitioner, namely, Mandakini Devi, against part of order/judgment dated 18.09.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 6356 of 2014 whereby and whereunder
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.