SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 510

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kumar Mehta, son of Kumar Prasad Mehta - Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Cr.M.P. No. 2595 of 2019
Decided on : 20-10-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, A.P.P.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 82 and 83 - Proclamation for person absconding - Non-bailable warrant of arrest and process - Petitioners have filed this petition for quashing orders whereby non-bailable warrant of arrest and process under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. respectively have been issued against petitioners - Order is also under challenge in this petition, whereby, petitioners have been declared absconder and permanent warrant of arrest has been issued against them in connection with Sadar P.S. Case, corresponding to G.R. Case, pending in court of learned C.J.M. - Learned counsel for petitioners submits that summon was not served upon petitioners and straightway non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued against them vide order - Held, It transpires that without execution of the summon, straightway non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued against petitioners - Processes under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. have been directed to be issued against petitioners vide order which is not in accordance with the parameters of Cr.P.C. and also as per those Sections. The order is cryptic in nature as there is no satisfaction of learned Magistrate recorded in order, which is mandatory under Cr.P.C. Since the orders are not passed in accordance with law, order will not survive - Accordingly, orders passed in connection with P.S. Case, corresponding to G.R. Case, pending court of learned C.J.M. quashed - Matter is remanded back to learned C.J.M. - Petitioners are directed to appear before concerned court and on that day, concerned court will pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law - Criminal miscellaneous petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Shailendra Jit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned A.P.P. for the opposite party-State.

2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been taken through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. The petitioners have filed this petition for quashing the orders dated 30.03.2010 and 22.11.2010 whereby non-bailable warrant of arrest and the process under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. respectively have been issued against the petitioners. The order dated 10.11.2018 is also under challenge in this petition, whereby, the petitioners have been declared absconder and permanent warrant of arrest has been issued against them in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.106 of 2009, corresponding to G.R. Case No.397/2009, pending in the court of the learned C.J.M., Hazaribag.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that summon was not served upon the petitioners and straightway non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued against them vide order dated 30.03.2010. He further submits that processes under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. have been issued against the petitioner vide order dated 22.11.2010 without execution of non-bailable warrant upon the petitioners and thereafter vide order dated 10.11.2018, the petitioners have been declared absconder.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State tries to justify the impugned orders.

6. On perusal of the order dated 30.03.2010, it transpires that without execution of the summon, straightway non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioners. The processes under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. have been directed to be issued against the petitioners vide order dated 22.11.2010, which is not in accordance with the parameters of the Cr.P.C. and also as per those Sections. The order dated 22.11.2010 is cryptic in nature as there is no satisfaction of the learned Magistrate recorded in the order, which is mandatory under the Cr.P.C. Since the orders dated 30.03.2010 and 22.11.2010 are not passed in accordance with law, the order dated 10.11.2018 will not survive. Accordingly, the orders dated 30.03.2010, 22.11.2010 and 10.11.2018 passed in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.106/2009, corresponding to G.R. Case No.397/2009, pending the court of the learned C.J.M., Hazaribag, are hereby quashed. The matter is remanded back to the learned C.J.M., Hazaribag. The petitioners are directed to appear before the concerned court on 25.11.2021 and on that day, the concerned court will pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law.

7. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands allowed and disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top