JUDGMENT :

With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and/or video quality.

2. The instant intra-Court appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the order/judgment dated 05.11.2020 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No. 2448 of 2018 and analogous cases whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge has refused to interfere with the memorandum of charge by dismissing the writ petition leaving it open to the petitioner to demonstrate the points before the departmental proceeding.

3. The brief facts of the case which require to be enumerated herein, read as under :-

One Mukhlal Hari was a permanent employee working on the post of Sweeper in Bokaro Colliery under Respondent No.1 since 1957. The said Mukhlal Hari was issueless and accordingly, in or around the year 1970, he adopted the writ petitioner when he was aged about 5 years, after performing prevalent ceremony in their custom in the society.

The date of birth of the writ petitioner is 21.10.1965 and, therefore, he has made an application for appointment on compassionate groun