SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 537

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Binesh Sharma, S/o. Laldeo Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Amit Kumar Das.
For the Opposite Party : Ms. Snehlika Bhagat, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Snehlika Bhagat, learned A.P.P. for the opposite party-State.

2. Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the order dated 14.01.2020, he has not filed the supplementary affidavit as he has not been able to procure the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. He further submits that after dismissal of the S.L.P., the Division Bench order whereby award was modified, has been complied with.

3. In view of such submission, final hearing of this petition has been concluded on behalf of the parties.

4. This petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with G. Case No.48 of 2013 including the order dated 16.05.2013 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh, whereby, cognizance for the offence under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been taken against the petitioner. The further prayer is made to quash the order dated 28.05.2019 whereby the bail granted to the petitioner has been cancelled and non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner.

5. The case was filed by the Labour Enforcement Officer (Centr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top