JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.

2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for following reliefs:-

(i) For quashing the order dated 04.06.2012 issued under the signature of respondent no.3 vide memo no.967 whereby and where under the said respondent without issuing any charge-sheet and without conducting any proceeding has ordered for permanent deduction of 10% from the pension of the petitioner is absolute disregard to the provision of Rule 43(b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules.

(ii) For quashing of the letter no.894 dated 16.08.2012 issued under the signature of respondent no.6 whereby and where under the said respondent has revised the pension of the petitioner from Rs.10,990/- per months to Rs.9891/- w.e.f. 01.08.07 by deducting 10% of the pension as per office order no.967 dated 04.06.2012.

(iii) For issuance of appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents to immediately and forthwith release/pay balance 10% of the pension amount which has been illegally deducted/recovered from the pension of the petitioner.

3. The facts as disclosed in the instant writ application are th