IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, JJ.
Durga Prashanna Sahoo - Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the Director General, Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, New Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(S) No. 4824 of 2018
Decided on : 27-01-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Applicant applied to higher grade post of Senior Technical Officer/Grade-III (4), which required essential qualification of B.E./B.Tech with 55% marks - After interview he was declared successful for post and was appointed - However, his joining was kept in abeyance - He submitted a representation for redressal of his grievance - Later he has been served with order whereby his offer of appointment has been cancelled - CAT found that issue of validity of degree awarded by University raised by applicant is devoid of merits – Held, applicant claims that being enrolled during academic years 2001-2005 i.e., for sessions 2005-2008, for pursing B.Tech degree from University, applicant was covered by exception and also succeeded in first attempt in test conducted by AICTE - AICTE in its response has also stated that petitioner appeared in said examination conducted by it in month of June 2018 and passed his B.Tech examination, degree of which was duly validated by UGCAICTE - Petitioner having passed examination in academic session 2005-2008 could not get any relief - Impugned order passed by CAT, dismissing original application does not appear to be correct on a complete reading of judgment of Apex Court along with clarification contained in order and stand taken by AICTE as well - Order set aside - Writ petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The writ petition was earlier admitted for hearing vide order dated 19.12.2018. Today it has been posted under the heading for orders on I.A. No. 1785 of 2019 for stay of the impugned order and early hearing of the petition. However, with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being disposed of at this stage itself in the following manner:
Applicant, who is the writ petitioner approached this Court being aggrieved by the order dated 16.02.2018 passed in O.A./051/00090/2017 by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, circuit sitting at Ranchi. As the undisputed facts disclose, applicant was appointed on the post of Group-II(3), Senior Technician-1 in CSIR National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur in 2007 on the basis of a diploma in Mechanical Engineering from Utkalmani Gopabandhu Institute of Engineering, Rourkela, Orissa. During service he enrolled himself in B.Tech decree course in Mechanical Engineering at Janardan Rai Nagar Vidyapeeth Rajasthan via distance education in the year 2005 for the academic session 2005-2008 and was awarded the B.Tech degree in 2010 upon passing of the examination in 2008. Thereafter he was granted study leave for one year to complete M.Tech degree course from National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur in 2010. In 2014 he was promoted from the post of Group-II(2) to Group-II(3) with benefit of two years early assessment based on B.Tech degree qualifications.
N.M.L., Jamshedpur issued an advertisement for the post of Technician, Tech. Assistant and Senior Technical Officer vide Advertisement No. 2/2015. Applicant applied to the higher grade post of Senior Technical Officer/Grade-III (4), which required essential qualification of B.E./B.Tech (Mechanical Engineering) with 55% marks. After interview he was declared successful for the post vide notification dated 21.01.2016 and was appointed vide letter dated 05.02.2016. However, his joining was kept in abeyance. He submitted a representation for redressal of his grievance. Later he has been served with order dated 30.01.2017 whereby his offer of appointment has been cancelled on the following ground:
3. Applicant therefore approached the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) being aggrieved. Learned CAT took into account the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation Ltd. vrs. Rabi Sankar Patro & others along with analogous cases (judgment dated 03.11.2017 in Civil Appeal Nos. 17869-17870 of 2017). Before the learned CAT, petitioner had contended that the degree of B.Tech awarded by the J.R.N University on 05.07.2010 for the academic session 2005-2008 is protected by the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as it applies to all those students who had taken admission for the academic session 2001-2005.
4. Learned CAT negatived this contention referring to para 46,47,48,52 and 53 of the judgment in the case of Rabi Sankar Patro (supra) and held as under:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.