SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 674

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Ratnaker Bhengra, J.
Chiraguddin Sheikh @ Chiraguddin, son of Dastali Sheikh and ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 797 of 2003
Decided On : 19-02-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Arbind Kumar Choudhary
For the Respondent: Rajesh Kumar Mishra, APP

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 323, 324 and 307/149 - After completion of investigation charge sheet was submitted and cognizance of offences were taken and case was committed to court of sessions - Charges were framed against accused persons accordingly and trial was held and at conclusion of trial accused persons or appellant herein were convicted and sentenced - Appellants argued that in this case main conviction has been done under section 307 IPC solely without assistance of either section 34 or section 149 of IPC and in facts and circumstances of case conviction under section 307 of IPC cannot be applied to all appellants together without assistance of aforesaid relevant IPC sections - A.P.P. has argued that this is a case in which there is sufficient evidence to convict appellants for crime they have committed and sentence imposed on them by learned court below is fully justified – Held, there is conflicting evidence regarding assault made, both in evidence of both P.W. 1 and P.W.-2 and as to on whom assault was made whether on Latif or whether on Suleman - Therefore, charges under section 148 and section 324 of IPC against appellant no.3 for assault with farsa is not proved and his conviction is modified to one under section 147 and 323 of IPC - It is also seen from evidence of doctor P.W. 11 that injuries of P.W.-7 though being five in number but, all injuries were simple in nature including injuries of P.W.-9 being also five in number and also all simple in nature and finally injuries sustained by informant P.W.-8 numbering three were also all simple in nature - Prosecution has been able to prove charges against these appellants under section 323 IPC and section 147 of IPC - Conviction of appellant no. 3 under section 324 IPC and section 148 IPC is modified to one under section 323 IPC and section 147 of IPC - Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Ratnaker Bhengra, J.

The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.06.2003 passed in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1982 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. V, Deoghar, whereby and where under all the appellants were convicted under section 307 of Indian Penal Code and appellant no. 1,2,4 and 6 to 10 were convicted under sections 323 and 147 of Indian Penal Code. Further, appellant no. 3 and appellant no. 5 were convicted under section 324 and 148 of Indian Penal Code. All the appellants were sentenced to R.I. for 5 years under section 307 of Indian Penal Code and Appellant no. 1,2,4 and 6 to 10 were sentenced to 1 year R.I under section 147 of Indian Penal Code and for 6 months under section 323 IPC. Further, Appellant no. 3 and Appellant no. 5 were sentenced to undergo R.I for 2 years under section 148 of Indian Penal Code and R.I. and for 3 years under section 324 of Indian Penal Code. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. As per report submitted by police inspector-cum-officer-incharge, Madhupur-Police Station vide memo no.158/18 dated 23-2- 2018, Appellant no.-5 Jegun Biwi and Appellant No.-10 Sabir Sheikh @ Md. Sabir have died. Hence, appeal of Appellant no.-5 Jegun Biwi and Appellant No.-10 Sabir Sheikh @ Md. Sabir stands abated.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, as per the fardbeyan dated 15.7.78 of the informant P.W. 8 Abdul Rajjak, resident of village Lalgarh, P.S. Madhupur, Distt- Santhal Pargana is that they have an ancestral land at village- Patharia and his elder brother Latif Sheikh (P.W-7) is living in the ancestral house at village- Patharia. Informant further stated that his elder brother Latif Sheikh had purchased a BClass Railway land in village- Patharia itself from Jegun Biwi wife of Dhako Sheikh of village Korokado, P.S. Madhupur. On 15.7.1978, at about 8 a.m. while, he along with his two brothers Latif Sheikh (P.W.-7) and Suleman Sheikh ( P.W.-9) were ploughing their field, the accused persons, who were 14 in numbers, variously armed with weapons, all of the sudden, came there. The informant further stated that accused Ajiz Sheikh was armed with barchha, Idris Sheikh was armed with lathi, Babujan Sheikh was armed with farsa and accused Dhako Sheikh and his wife Jegun Biwi were armed with sword. Thereafter, accused persons namely Bijli Sheikh, Dhako Sheikh, Aziz Sheikh and Idrish Sheikh started assaulting the informant as a result informant fell down. His brothers Latif Sheikh and Suleman Sheikh also sustained injury and they also fell down. Informant further stated that Nur Mohammad ( P.W. 3), Nemul Sheikh ( P.W. 2), Basir Sheikh ( P.W. 1) and Abdur Rahman (P.W. 6), who were present at the place of occurrence restrained the accused persons and any how they were able to save their life.

4. On the basis of the fardbeyan of the informant, Madhupur Police Case no. 8/1978 was registered against the accused persons under sections 147, 148, 323, 324 and 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code. After completion of investigation charge sheet was submitted and the cognizance of the offences were taken and the case was committed to the court of sessions. Charges were framed against the accused persons accordingly and trial was held and at the conclusion of trial accused persons or appellant herein were convicted and sentenced as aforesaid. Hence, this appeal.

5. Prosecution had examined altogether 11 witnesses in support of its case out of whom Abdul Rajjak P.W.-8 is the informant of the case. P.W.-7 Latif Sheikh and P.W.-9 Suleman Sheikh are the brothers of the informant. P.W.-1 is Basir Sheikh; P.W.-2 is Nemul Sheikh; P.W.-3 is Nur Mohammad; P.W.-4 is Amir Sheikh, P.W.-5 is Kurban Mian; P.W.-6 Abdur Rehman is a tendered witness, P.W.-10 Shankar Prasad is the investigating officer of the case and P.W.-11 is Dr. S.S Daruka, who had examined the injured persons. D.W.-1 Jegun Biwi was examined as defense witness.

6. P.W.-8 Abdul Rajja

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top