SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 595

S.N.PATHAK
Laxman Oraon, son of Late Dhanai Oraon – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rohit Roy
For the Respondent: Karan Shahdeo, AC to SC-II

ORDER :

S.N. Pathak, J.

In view of outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, case has been taken up through Video Conferencing and heard at length. Concerned lawyers have no objection with regard to the proceeding which has been held through Video Conferencing and there is no complaint in respect to audio and video clarity and quality and after hearing at length, the matter is being disposed of finally.

PRAYER

2. Petitioner has knocked door of this Court with a prayer for quashing the order dated 21.04.2012, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Gumla in SAR Appeal No. 41 of 2007, by which concerned respondent has been pleased to allow appeal preferred by the respondent nos. 6 to 13 and has been further pleased to set aside the order dated 03.11.1999, passed by the Additional Collector, Gumla in SAR Case No. 207/ 1992 – 93. Petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the concerned respondents to restore the land in question under the provisions of Section 71A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 in favour of the petitioner.

FACTUAL MATRIX

3. The factual exposition as has been stated in the writ petition is that the land falling under Khata No. 4, Plot Nos. 31, 33, 56, 58, 252 and 332 of vil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top