SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Phool Chand Ram Mahto @ Fulchand Mahto, S/o. Ghanshyam Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.
Heard Mr. P.P.N. Roy, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party-State and Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.
3. The petitioners have filed this criminal miscellaneous petition for quashing the order dated 27.06.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih in Complaint Case No.179 of 2017, whereby, cognizance of the offences under Sections 409, 420, 477-A, 120-B and 506 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken and summons under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been issued against the petitioners.
4. A complaint case was filed by opposite party no.2 on 09.02.2017, which was numbered as Complaint Case No.179 of 2017, wherein, it has been alleged that on 09.09.2004, the opposite
Harshendra Kumar D. vs. Rebatilata Koley and Others
State of Haryana and others v. Chy. Bhajan Lal and others
Indian Oil Corpn. v. NEPC India Ltd.
G. Sagar Suri & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Mrs. Anita Malhotra v. Apparel Export Promotion Council & Anr.
Birla Corporation Limited v. Adventz Investments and Holdings
Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. v. Biological E. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.