SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 19

NAVNEET KUMAR
Anirudh Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajendra Pd. Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

The instant criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.08.2003 and 22.08.2003 respectively passed by the court of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Chaibasa in Sessions Trial No. 125 of 1997 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court convicted both the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years therein.

2. Briefly stating, the prosecution story as unfolded in the beyan of the informant P.W. -1 Daya Nidhi Pradhan was recorded by ASI Raj Kumar Choudhary of Keraikella, Police Station on 08.10.1991 at 02:00 hours. The informant alleged that his sister was married to Akhil Pradhan who drove her out of his house after assaulting and since then his sister had been living with the informant. On 08.10.1991 his Bahnoi Akhil Pradhan came his village with one miscreant (gunda) namely Anirudh Pradhan. On that day at 12:30 in the day when the informant had gone to river for taking bath, Akhil Pradhan along with Anirudh Pradhan came at river and his Bahnoi ordered Anirudh to kill the informant, upon which Anirudh Pradhan in or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top